Which con is associated with using activities as reinforcers?

Using activities as reinforcers can present challenges, particularly related to practicality. When considering the effectiveness of activities as rewards, one must think about how feasible it is to use these types of reinforcers in various settings. For instance, not all environments may be conducive to implementing specific activities, and some may require considerable time and resources to execute properly.

In contrast, using tangible or material reinforcers often allows for more straightforward implementation, making it easier for practitioners to integrate reinforcement strategies seamlessly into their sessions. Moreover, practical concerns also include whether the activities are accessible to all clients or whether they might inadvertently lead to complications, such as equity issues among clients with different preferences or abilities.

While timing, waiting, and nutrition could have implications in other contexts or with different types of reinforcers, the overarching issue of practicality directly impacts how effectively one can use activities in a reinforcement strategy within communication disorders therapy settings.